CHS Anniversary Inter-Campus Debate Explores Digital Health and Healthcare Equity

As part of the 25th-anniversary celebrations of the University of Ghana’s College of Health Sciences (CHS), faculty members from the Legon and Korle-Bu campuses squared off in a lively inter-campus debate on the motion: “Digital Health Will Widen the Equity Gap in Healthcare Rather Than Bridge It.” 

The debate, held at the Great Hall, engaged participants and attendees in a thought-provoking discussion on the role of technology in shaping healthcare delivery in Ghana and across Africa.

The debating teams, judges and College officials 

Team Legon, comprising Dr. Lily Paemka, Dr. Justice Kumi and Dr. Constance Agbemelo-Tsomafo, argued against the motion. They contended that digital health innovations, such as telemedicine, electronic medical records and mobile health platforms, have the potential to enhance access to quality healthcare, especially in rural and underserved areas. Dr. Paemka who was lead speaker for Team Legon highlighted that digital tools can empower patients with health information and facilitate remote consultations, bridging geographical barriers.

Team Korle-Bu, on the other hand, consisted of Dr. Mary Naa Barkor Ayettey-Adamafio, Dr. George Henry Acquah and Dr. Sarah Akua Osafo, who argued in favor of the motion. They stressed that without careful implementation, digital health could exacerbate existing inequalities. Dr. Akua Osafo pointed out that marginalised populations may lack access to smartphones, stable internet or digital literacy, leaving them further behind in accessing healthcare. The team collectively warned that technology-driven solutions could favour urban and wealthier populations, creating a “digital divide” in health outcomes.

The debate was closely contested, with Team Legon winning by scoring 74.6 points, compared to Korle-Bu’s 68.3 points. The session elicited applause from faculty, students and other attendees, who appreciated the depth of the arguments and the relevance of the discussion to contemporary health challenges.

The debate underscored the critical role of informed, evidence-based discourse in guiding healthcare policy and practice. It also reflected the approach of the College to promote intellectual engagement, promoting critical thinking and preparing health leaders who can navigate the complexities of digital health innovations while ensuring equity in healthcare delivery.